IA - Base Layer Concept map Derived from flows + jobs

Concept map

The concept layer: screens grouped by the person's intent, derived from the flows and jobs. Each node is a screen with the job it closes. States (empty / error / loading) are not here, they live in the flows and the matrix; page content and cards are the detail layer. Below: the intent map, the navigation model, and the traceability matrix.

Screens by intent

Not a hierarchy, a map of screens grouped by what the person is trying to do. Six intents (A to F) derived from the flows and jobs. Each node carries a short job-tag; no X.Y numbers, no states, no content cards, those belong to the detail layer.

flowchart TD
    subgraph GA["A. Get started (acquire + sign up)"]
      gs1["Landing / home
Main, item 1"] gs2["Pricing
item 1"] gs3["Sign up
item 1"] gs4["Log in
supporting"] end subgraph GB["B. Set up wellbeing (onboarding)"] sw1["Company setup
J6"] sw2["First program confirm
Main, J6, item 2"] sw3["Invite team
Main, item 3"] end subgraph GC["C. Run wellbeing and read the pulse"] rw1["Dashboard
E1, J1, J2"] rw2["Team pulse detail
J1, J2, E1"] rw3["Threshold alert
J2"] rw4["Program library
Main, J6"] rw5["Program detail / manage
Main, item 2"] rw6["Check-in setup
J2, J4, item 3"] end subgraph GD["D. Team and check-ins"] tc1["Team roster
Main, item 3"] tc2["Check-in, employee
J3, J4, E2"] tc3["Pre-Q1 disclosure
J3, E2"] tc4["Questions
J4"] tc5["Check-in complete
J4, E2"] end subgraph GE["E. Prove it and upgrade (owner)"] pu1["Share with owner
J1, J5, S2"] pu2["Invite owner + upgrade
S2, item 8"] pu3["Owner dashboard
J1, J5, item 8"] pu4["Monthly owner digest
S2, item 8"] end subgraph GF["F. Account and utility"] au1["Plan / subscription
item 1, item 8"] au2["Privacy center
J3, E2, item 4"] au3["Notifications
J4, items 9-10"] au4["Account
supporting"] au5["System: 404 / 500 / cookie
all"] end gs3 --> sw1 sw3 --> rw1 rw1 --> tc1 rw6 --> tc2 tc2 --> tc3 tc3 --> tc4 tc4 --> tc5 rw2 --> pu1 pu1 --> pu2 pu2 --> pu3 rw1 -.-> au1
Concept, not the site map. This consolidates the eleven detailed clusters (0 to 11 in Sitemap) into six human intents. It shows what the product is made of, by intent, and how screens connect along the flows. The full tree with X.Y nodes and content cards is the detail layer.

Traceability Matrix

Screens (rows) by jobs (columns). A tick means the screen participates in closing that job. An empty row is an orphan screen; an empty column is an orphan job. Both are defects, surfaced and resolved below.

Screen MainJ1J2J3J4J5J6E1E2E3S1S2
1 Landing
2 Pricing
3 Sign up
4 Log in
5 Company setup
6 First program confirm
7 Invite team
8 Dashboard
9 Team pulse detail
10 Threshold alert detail
11 Program library
12 Program detail / manage
13 Check-in setup
14 Team roster
15 Share with owner
16 Invite owner + upgrade
17 Plan / subscription
18 Privacy center
19 Notifications
20 Account
21 Owner dashboard
22 Monthly owner digest
23 Check-in
24 Pre-Q1 disclosure
25 Questions
26 Check-in complete

Orphan screens (empty rows)

4 Log in
20 Account
Close no job on their own. Resolution: keep, reclassify as supporting infrastructure. They gate every operator job; removing them removes access to all job-closing screens. The one honest exception to "no empty row," not cut.

Orphan jobs (empty columns)

S1
Tell network what works has no MVP screen. Resolution: backlog / [?]. S1 is a [?] hypothesis; the referral surface is parked (Stage 2 cut list bans cash referral, organic operator-to-peer is out of MVP scope). Validate S1 first, then a lightweight share surface post-MVP. Intentional hole.
Thin coverage (not a hole to fill in MVP): E3 (caring leader) is covered only by Owner dashboard / digest as shareable proof, a [?] hypothesis. Hypothesis jobs HJ1 and HJ2 are deliberately parked (HJ2 = backlog item 12 LATER).
Net: one real orphan job (S1, to backlog), zero orphan screens to cut (two supporting-infrastructure rows kept), no MVP job left uncovered.